Trump Targets Haberman in Heated Truth Social Rant Ahead of Lawsuit
Trump rips Haberman says she ll pay – President Donald Trump has launched a pointed critique of New York Times correspondent Maggie Haberman, warning that the journalist will face consequences for her recent commentary regarding his mental and physical well-being. The confrontation comes as the administration prepares for a significant legal battle with the newspaper, with Trump emphasizing that Haberman’s coverage will be scrutinized when the case reaches judicial proceedings.
The Lawsuit Threat and Personal Attack
During a Saturday evening posting on his Truth Social platform, the president directed his frustration toward Haberman, who had raised questions about his cognitive clarity following a string of notable verbal missteps. Among these incidents was his reference to Iran as the “Islamic State of Japan,” an error that drew widespread attention.
“Maggot Hagerman has covered me incorrectly for ten years,” he wrote. “She has made a living off her bad reporting, and will pay the price when our Multi Billion Dollar Lawsuit against The Failing New York Times gets to Court.”
Trump’s response was particularly forceful, combining a personal jab with a reminder of the substantial financial stakes involved in the pending litigation. The president has consistently referred to the Times as “failing” in his public statements, and this latest exchange underscores his ongoing dissatisfaction with the publication’s coverage.
Health Claims and Cognitive Testing
Addressing concerns about his mental acuity, Trump highlighted recent medical evaluations he has undergone. He stated that he completed a comprehensive physical examination at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, a facility known for treating military personnel and high-profile patients.
“I just finished a perfect physical at Walter Reed, I do it every six months, and I requested another Cognitive Test, the only President to do so, three times, and I aced them all,” he said. “Few people in Washington, D.C., could do so, including Maggot and her flunky associate, Jonathan Swan.”
The president’s emphasis on cognitive testing appears to be a direct response to Haberman’s observations about his mental state. By noting that he is the only president to request such tests multiple times, Trump positioned himself as proactive in addressing health concerns.
NATO Summit Incident and Haberman’s Analysis
The timing of Trump’s criticism coincided with Haberman’s appearance on MS Now, where she discussed broader concerns about transparency regarding the president’s health. Her comments came in the wake of a memorable moment at the NATO Summit held in Ankara, Turkey, where Trump mistakenly referred to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky using Russian President Vladimir Putin’s name.
“His health is like a black box inside that administration,” Haberman said on MS Now. “They have released less and less information.”
This characterization of the White House as opaque on health matters resonated with critics who have questioned the level of detail provided to the public about the president’s condition.
Jonathan Swan’s Response
Jonathan Swan, the Times reporter who partnered with Haberman on the bestselling volume “Regime Change,” was not spared from Trump’s criticism. The president specifically mentioned Swan in his Truth Social post, referring to him as Haberman’s “flunky associate.”
Swan responded with characteristic professionalism, expressing willingness to engage in further dialogue with the president.
“I would be honored to do another on-camera interview with President Trump whenever he wants,” Swan wrote on the social platform X.
Additionally, Swan addressed Trump’s characterization of their book as “boring” and containing “fake reporting” by sharing evidence of its commercial success. He posted a screenshot from Amazon’s rankings, which showed “Regime Change” occupying the top position among the “Top 20 Most Sold & Most Read Books of the Week” for the week beginning July 5, 2026.
“Many people disagree with the president’s assessment,” Swan wrote. “Thanks to you all for reading.”
The exchange highlights the ongoing tension between the Trump administration and major news organizations, with both sides using social media platforms to shape public perception of their respective positions.
