Mandelson files: It’s difficult to see how Starmer can put this right
Mandelson Files: Starmer’s Challenges in Resolving the Scandal
The initial release of the Mandelson files failed to uncover a decisive proof or a major surprise. While the 147-page document outlined the vetting, appointment, and dismissal of the former US ambassador, it highlighted the exorbitant £75,000 payment Mandelson received for his sacking—despite requesting nearly £550,000. Additionally, it revealed that the prime minister’s national security adviser, Jonathan Powell, deemed the process “unusual” and “weirdly rushed.”
Key Revelations in the Document
The files also indicated that Mandelson maintained a close connection with Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile financier, even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for procuring an underage girl. A two-page due diligence report from the cabinet office flagged potential issues, including Mandelson’s alleged stay at Epstein’s residence during his 2009 jail term. The report warned of reputational risks tied to his relationship with Epstein.
Ongoing Relationship with Epstein
We were already aware that Sir Keir Starmer had knowledge of Mandelson’s “ongoing relationship” with Epstein. However, the files added weight to this by showing the pair’s bond persisted long after Epstein’s initial conviction. This detail, combined with the rushed nature of Mandelson’s appointment, cast doubt on the thoroughness of the vetting process.
Red Flags in the Due Diligence
The due diligence report, concise yet critical, noted that Mandelson’s ties to Epstein were “particularly close” and continued past Epstein’s 2008 sentencing. It emphasized the personal connection between the appointee and the prime minister, suggesting a political appointment carried greater risk than a diplomatic one. The report warned, “If anything goes wrong, you could be more exposed as the individual is more connected to you personally.”
Powell’s Misgivings
Jonathan Powell, a key adviser to the prime minister, expressed caution about Mandelson’s December 2024 appointment. Minutes from a September 2025 call reveal Powell raised concerns regarding Mandelson’s “individual and reputation” to Morgan McSweeney, the PM’s chief of staff. McSweeney reportedly stated the issues had been resolved.
Foreign Office’s Perspective
Philip Barton, the Foreign Office’s top civil servant at the time, also voiced reservations, as noted in Powell’s account. The lack of in-depth scrutiny into Mandelson’s ties to Epstein, despite the two-page report, has sparked questions about the completeness of the investigation.
Epstein Files’ Impact
The revelation of Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein gained further traction after the US Department of Justice released files detailing the depth of their friendship. These documents led to his arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office, with allegations that he shared confidential information during his time in Gordon Brown’s cabinet. Mandelson has denied any wrongdoing.
PM’s Defense
The prime minister has asserted that he was repeatedly misled by Mandelson, with No 10 emphasizing that follow-up questions were posed to the former Labour peer following the due diligence. This aligns with Sir Keir’s account, though the Met Police have withheld additional documents to avoid influencing the ongoing investigation.
Shadow Chancellor’s Criticism
“Now the prime minister claims he was lied to. He wasn’t lied to by this due diligence document. And it may be that Mandelson denied these claims. If so, maybe the prime minister was lied to, but he was lied to by an inveterate liar who had been fired twice before,”
stated Alex Burghart, the shadow chancellor for the Duchy of Lancaster, during a House of Commons session. He added, “We’re supposed to believe, that the prime minister, who was once the chief prosecutor in this country, couldn’t see through this nonsense. It beggars belief.”
Next Steps in the Investigation
Only a small portion of the documents—expected to number in the tens of thousands—was published on Wednesday. Darren Jones, a government representative, mentioned the intention to release the rest “soon.” These upcoming releases could provide further clarity on the decisions made and the information relayed to the prime minister.
Further Analysis
With more documents set to be disclosed, the focus remains on understanding the extent of the PM’s awareness and the rationale behind the appointment. The unfolding narrative continues to challenge Starmer’s ability to navigate the controversies surrounding Mandelson’s role in the government.
