ProVpnAdvice
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

Erdoğan cashes in on Trump relationship for Turkey

Published June 28, 2026 · Updated June 28, 2026 · By Nancy Garcia

Erdoğan Leverages Trump Alliance for Turkey's Military Advancements

Erdoğan cashes in on Trump relationship - Turkey's President, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is capitalizing on his strong ties with U.S. President Donald Trump to secure significant benefits. These advantages include relief from sanctions and the suspension of several court cases, all set against the backdrop of an upcoming NATO summit in Ankara. The summit, scheduled for next month, marks a pivotal moment for international relations, and Erdoğan’s recent gains in Washington are positioned to bolster his influence during the event.

Trump's Approval of the $700 Million Military Deal

President Trump’s decision to approve a military sales package worth over $700 million for Turkey has been a decisive move that underscores Erdoğan’s strategic advantages. This agreement, which involves advanced jet engines, is critical for Turkey’s efforts to develop its own fleet of next-generation fighter jets. Despite resistance from some lawmakers, the deal has been finalized, reflecting a shift in U.S. policy that favors close alliances over political friction.

“Erdoğan’s a great leader, very strong person, great military … everything I’ve ever asked him for he’s done.”

Trump highlighted Erdoğan’s cooperation during a press briefing, stating that the Turkish leader had played a crucial role in keeping the U.S. and Israel’s conflict with Iran from escalating. The president noted that Erdoğan had resisted providing aid to Iran, a move that aligns with Trump’s broader foreign policy goals. This partnership has allowed Erdoğan to strengthen his position within NATO, leveraging the U.S. relationship to secure international support.

Critics Voice Concerns Over Technology Transfer

Not everyone in the U.S. is pleased with the deal. Mark Levin, a conservative Fox News host and vocal Trump supporter, expressed immediate dissent. Levin emphasized that the memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran was a key factor in the criticism, arguing that Turkey should not receive the best American technology. “Stop giving our best technology away to Islamist nut job Erdogan! Turkey became a NATO member long before Erdoğan seized power,” he tweeted.

Levin’s comments reflect a broader concern among some U.S. allies about Turkey’s alignment with adversarial nations. While Turkey is a strategic NATO ally, its position as a bridge between Europe and the Middle East has been complicated by Erdoğan’s policies. The country’s proximity to key regions and its control over vital maritime routes make it a critical player, yet its relationships with Iran, Russia, and Hamas have raised eyebrows.

Turkey's Geopolitical Role and Domestic Policies

Turkey holds a unique position in global geopolitics, straddling Europe and the Middle East. It borders the Caucasus and Iran, and its strategic location along the Black Sea and Mediterranean makes it a hub for international trade and security. Additionally, Turkey has hosted nearly 3 million refugees, primarily from Syria and the Islamic State, since the early 2010s. These factors have solidified its status as a key NATO partner.

However, Erdoğan’s consolidation of power has drawn criticism from Europe and pro-democracy groups. His administration has been accused of using authoritarian tactics to suppress dissent, jailing political opponents, journalists, and academics. This has led to tensions with NATO members, including Greece and Cyprus, who feel threatened by Turkey’s assertive policies. Despite these challenges, Erdoğan continues to navigate the alliance with a mix of leverage and loyalty.

International Leverage and Domestic Stability

Erdoğan’s close alliance with Trump has granted him a powerful tool to maintain international legitimacy. The president’s endorsement has shielded Turkey from isolation, particularly within NATO, where the military sale is seen as a means to strengthen ties. The U.S. has long relied on Turkey’s defense partnerships to fill gaps in its own military production, especially during periods of delay or scarcity.

“Turkey comes in handy there. It already has these defense partnerships, and it’s only going to strengthen those partnerships,” explained Gönül Tol, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. Tol noted that Erdoğan’s Turkey serves as a critical hub for military production, capable of compensating for U.S. shortcomings. This dynamic has allowed Turkey to remain a key player in regional and global security matters, even as it faces scrutiny from European allies.

Erdoğan’s ability to maintain a personal rapport with Trump has been a defining feature of his foreign policy. According to Tol, this connection has given the Turkish leader a unique position in shaping U.S. priorities. Trump, known for prioritizing loyalty, has praised Erdoğan for his consistent support, even as Turkey’s anti-American sentiment grows. A recent Pew survey revealed that only 6% of Turkish respondents trusted Trump to act in the country’s best interests, and a mere 13% held a favorable view of the United States.

NATO Summit and the Power of Host Nations

The upcoming NATO summit in Ankara is a testament to the significance of Erdoğan’s influence. Trump has stated that he will attend the event solely because Erdoğan is hosting, highlighting the personal relationship’s impact on diplomatic decisions. NATO, in turn, has agreed to accommodate Turkey’s requests, allowing the country to control the selection of journalists covering the summit. “For summits and ministerial meetings held outside NATO Headquarters, NATO relies on the host nation to provide assessments on journalists from their country to ensure access to the meeting site,” a NATO spokesperson explained.

Erdoğan’s strategic maneuvers have not only secured military aid but also positioned Turkey as a central figure in NATO’s operations. This leverage allows him to shape the narrative around Turkey’s role in the alliance, despite criticisms from figures like Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.), who argued that Turkey should not receive advanced equipment while it remains the only NATO member to avoid sanctioning Russia. “As long as Turkey is under the leadership of Erdoğan who aligns himself with Iran and Russia, harbors Hamas & remains the only NATO member to not sanction Russia, Turkey should NOT receive our best jets and military equipment,” Malliotakis posted on X.

While the U.S. and its allies have historically supported Turkey, the country’s actions under Erdoğan have sparked debates about its reliability. The military sale, however, appears to reinforce the current administration’s commitment to maintaining strong ties with the Turkish leader. This decision underscores the complex balance between geopolitical interests and domestic political dynamics, as Erdoğan continues to assert his influence on the global stage.